1.02 Governance -Faculty Handbook
Abstract: | Review/Revised Date: 8/15/2024
Policy Owner: Faculty Senate
|
1.2.2.1 UAB Faculty Participation in Shared Governance in a Community of Learners
As reflected in the preamble of the UAB Faculty Senate Constitution, the principle of shared governance is essential for ensuring a culture of trust, collaboration, and mutual accountability. Faculty participation in governance promotes a diversity of ideas, collaboration, shared responsibility, collegiality, and institutional excellence.
Faculty shall have representation on committees/groups at the University and academic unit level that support the practice of shared governance. Refer to the Faculty Senate website then Documents for the Faculty Senate preamble, constitution and bylaws. Refer to UAB’s Policies and Procedures Library for a compilation of UAB policies, procedures and guidelines.
1.2.2.1.1 Faculty Representation and Participation on University Committees
Certain University standing committees address issues related to the primary purpose and priorities of the University; these committees have a broad impact and are better informed by faculty representation. University committees for which the Faculty Senate should recommend representatives may include but are not limited to those listed on the UAB University-Wide Committees website.
All University standing committees shall have written copies of their function and structure available for faculty. University ad-hoc committees that affect university faculty shall have faculty representation selected by the Faculty Senate.
1.2.2.1.2 Faculty Representation and Participation on Academic Unit or Departmental Committees
Faculty participation on standing and ad hoc committees at the academic unit or departmental levels is critical to the mission and goals of the academic units and the University in teaching, research and scholarship. Forms of faculty governance will vary among units and should be regularly updated. Academic standing committees shall have written copies of their function and structure available for faculty. On ad hoc committees at the unit level, an appointing authority will communicate in writing to the committee chair and participating faculty members the purpose of the committee as well as an expected timeline for completion of the charge. Ad hoc groups or committees are meant to be time limited and dissolved upon completion of their charge.
1.2.2.1.3 Faculty Participation in Evaluation of University and Academic Administrators
1.2.2.1.3.1 Faculty Senate Evaluation of University and Academic Administrators
The Faculty Senate Executive Committee of the UAB Faculty Senate shares responsibility with the President and Provost for periodic evaluations of academic administrators (chairs and deans) and university administrators (the Provost and the President) by their constituents. The Senate evaluations shall be utilized by the immediate supervisor as a component of comprehensive reviews to assess performance of responsibilities. Within 120 days of distribution of results, all administrators who are evaluated will provide to the evaluating constituents, written and verbal feedback on the report including plans to address all major survey outcomes.
Full- and part-time regular faculty members of the University have the right to participate in these Senate administrator evaluations.
1.2.2.1.3.2 Faculty Participation in Administrator Evaluations Conducted at the Academic Unit or Departmental Level
All faculty members with a primary academic full-time or part-time appointment may also evaluate deans, associate or assistant deans, department chairs, or program directors/coordinators at an academic or departmental level independent of Faculty Senate evaluations (e.g., requirement of accreditation standards, achievement of strategic plans) if said administrators are not included in the Faculty Senate evaluations. These independent evaluations will be developed by faculty and administrators of the academic unit or department.