Review of Modifications to Research at Convened IRB Meetings- PRO144   

 

 

Abstract: 
This procedure outlines the responsibilities of the OIRB and IRB for formation and assignment of IRB member primary review teams for initial or continuing review or review of modifications to research at convened IRB meetings.

Effective Date: 3/30/2007

 

Review/Revised Date: 

 

Category: Research

 

Policy Owner: Vice President for Research

Policy Contact:

 

   
 
 

PROCEDURE
 

OIRB Responsibilities


Administrative Staff:

  • Assigns Primary Reviewer(s) using the list of members (including alternates) selected for the convened IRB meeting (see PRO143 Procedure for IRB Member Selection for Convened Meeting):
    • Assigns, optimally, three members to review each submission  as follows:
      • At least one physician scientist or non-physician scientist At least one member who does not have a scientific background, whenever possible
      • At least one member who does not have an affiliation with UAB, whenever possible
  • Uses Reviewer(s) assignment in development of convened IRB agenda for initial and continuing review, and review of modifications of protocols

 

IRB Responsibilities


Chair (or designee):

  • Examines the agenda for each meeting to determine if a consultant is needed for:
    • Scientific expertise
    • Representation of vulnerable populations
    • Understanding of local context
    • Other issues
  • Appoints consultants as necessary for research protocols to receive adequate review

 

IRB Member assigned as the Reviewer(s) for a convened IRB meeting:

  • Reviews each protocol and associated materials assigned to the Primary Reviewer(s) in sufficient depth for oral presentation at meeting
  • Reviews all materials assigned to each IRB member for discussion at the meeting