TABLE OF
CONTENTS
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
IMPLEMENTATION AT UCSD
III.
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND ESSENTIAL ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES
IV.
PROPRIETORS: UCSD POSITIONS HAVING DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ELECTRONIC
INFORMATION RESOURCES
Table 1, Requirements for Resource Security Under IS-3
Table 2, EIR Proprietor Assignment
V. UCSD PHYSICAL SECURITY GUIDELINES FOR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES
VI.
VIEW OF PHYSICAL SECURITY
A.
Inventory
B.
Physical Issues
C.
Disaster Scenarios
D.
Procedural Issues
VII.
UCSD LOGICAL SECURITY GUIDELINES FOR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES
A.
Authentication and Authorization
B.
Revision control
C.
Logging
D.
Backup
E.
Privacy
VIII.
CONCLUSION
SUPPLEMENT I, Physical Security Considerations
Table 3, Example: Physical Inventory
SUPPLEMENT II, Logical Security
SUPPLEMENT III, Guidelines for Secondary Holders
Table 4, Case Student Sensitivity/Criticality Checklist
SUPPLEMENT IV, References and Related Links
SECURITY FOR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AT UCSD
I.
INTRODUCTION
The University of
California Office of
the President issued Business and Finance Bulletin (BFB) IS-3, Electronic Information Security, on November 12, 1998. Campuses are required to
establish local implementation guidelines for electronic information resources (EIRs) in their control. Individuals should become familiar with it before reviewing UCSD implementation
guidelines.
The UCSD Electronic Information Security Task Force (EISTF), a campus-wide advisory group to
the Administrative Computing and Telecommunications Policy Committee (ACTPC), was charged to establish local procedures and practices for implementing BFB IS-3.
The EISTF is
active in classifying information resources for disaster-recovery planning,
establishing standards and practices for providing security based on data levels described in BFB IS-3 and communicating requirements to the UCSD community.
II.
IMPLEMENTATION AT UCSD
UCSD has designated the Director of Academic Computing Services (ACS) as coordinator for this policy.
In conjunction with the ACS Manager of Network Security, the coordinator will:
•
Develop campus guidelines for determining which positions have job responsibilities that
directly support Essential EIRs.
•
Develop campus guidelines for the physical security of EIRs.
•
Develop campus guidelines for the logical security of EIRs.
•
Conduct an annual survey of
EIR holders to determine which EIRs are both “Essential” and “Restricted” [See Table 2, Electronic Information Resources – Proprietor Assignment]
•
Verify that Essential EIRs have a disaster plan.
•
Verify that Essential EIRs have a backup procedure.
•
Review the physical security controls for Essential-Restricted EIRs.
•
Review the logical controls (access control, change management, backup and retention,
communications
security, and protection against intrusive software) on Essential- Restricted EIRs
•
Verify with EIR holders that managerial security guidelines from BFB IS-3 have been
established to
pertain to those positions that have access to Essential EIRs.
•
Verify that security roles are filled for Essential EIRs.
•
Communicate problems that are revealed by the surveys to responsible management and
provide advice on
appropriate remedies.
•
Track, take preventative measures, and react to
intrusive computer software (viruses, etc).
This document offers guidelines intended to reduce risks to Electronic Information Resources through preventative measures and controls. The guidelines apply to certain EIRs on all
campuses in the UC System including applications, operating systems, communication systems, data,
and associated hardware used in
University business administration. Holders of
other forms of data,
such as research data, would benefit from
applying the guidelines as well.
III.
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND ESSENTIAL ELECTRONIC INFORMATION
RESOURCES
Most, if not all, Essential EIRs depend on the reliable operation of network and other electronic communications services. Short of a natural disaster these services can and must be made
reliable enough that they can meet the requirements of an
Essential EIR. It should be
understood, however, that during large-scale outages, such as those that would be experienced
during the aftermath of a major earthquake, most electronic communications
services would not be fully operational. The intended recipient may not be physically present or able to receive communications or may be
present but not have a working method for access. For this reason,
those doing disaster planning should provide for alternate, reliable, methods to communicate
with and access Essential EIRs.
Store-and-forward services such as voicemail and email depend on there being a recipient
present who is
equipped with a functioning access device. This will not be the case in
most
large-scale outages. Disaster planners should develop procedures that verify that essential communications are actually received.
Network connectivity is
dependent on the physical integrity of infrastructure spread over a large
geographic area. During a large-scale event it is likely that connectivity to
Essential EIRs will
not be available from
all areas of the campus. Planners should provide for minimal access at a facility close to the Essential EIR processing facility.
IV.
PROPRIETORS: UCSD POSITIONS HAVING DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ELECTRONIC
INFORMATION RESOURCES
In order to determine the applicability of BFB IS-3 to specific electronic information resources at
UCSD, the EISTF developed Table 2, Electronic Information Resources – Proprietor Assignment. UCSD EIRs were identified and classified according to definitions found in BFB IS-3 and Table 1, Requirements for Resource Security, below. Holders are required to address
issues of Disaster Recovery, Backup, Logical and Physical Security, and Personnel Security as
is appropriate to the cell of Table 2 containing their EIR.
TABLE 1 – REQUIREMENTS FOR RESOURCE SECURITY UNDER
IS-3
|
Resource
Criticality
|
|
|
Essential
|
Required
|
Deferrable
|
|
Sensitivity
|
Restricted
|
Requires access security; must be in
Disaster Recovery
plan
|
Requires access security; may be in DR plan
|
Requires access security; need not be in DR
plan
|
|
Unrestricted
|
Minimal security
required; must be in DR plan
|
Minimal security
required; may
be in
DR plan
|
Minimal security
required; need not be in DR
plan
|
TABLE 2 – ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES–PROPRIETOR ASSIGNMENT
|
Sensitivity
|
Criticality
|
|
|
Essential
|
Required
|
Deferrable
|
|
Restricted
|
ISIS/SAM
IFIS
Monthly and Bi-Weekly
Payroll Payments
ACT Authentication System
Student Financial
Services
Name Service *
Network **
Email gateway
|
ISIS
PPS
Non-ISIS Student Systems
Authentication Systems
Kerberos
DHCP/BOOTP
Active Directory
Network Operations
Email distribution
Restricted Course Sites
Instructional Support
Servers
Library Automation –
Circulation
Student Health Services
|
Non-IFIS Financial Systems Non-PPS
Personnel/Payroll
Development
BFS Applications
HR Applications
Recharge Billing
Systems
Dial In
Grant Proposals
Link Family (Individual members may be
Required)
|
|
Unrestricted
|
Emergency Telephone System
800MHz Radio System
EH&S Applications
|
Telephone
Basic Network Services
Library Automation –
Public Access
Open Course Web Sites
Darwin/SQLDSE
InfoPath
Internet Service
Physical Plant Applications
|
Grant Reporting
Wireless Services
|
* Backup in ACT.
** Portions necessary to provide sufficient access for minimal processing.
Notes:
Some portion of IFIS, ISIS and PPS must be running as soon as possible since some functions
such as check-printing
(related to payroll and financial aid) are Essential/Restricted. Lower
criticality activities such as payroll update, can be relegated to
the Required or Deferrable
column. The applications and databases that support IFIS, ISIS and PPS are somewhat inseparable so the large subsystems or the entire facility is placed in the cell appropriate to
the most critical/sensitive aspect.
General network access to IFIS, ISIS, and PPS outside of
Torrey Pines Center South (TPCS)
is probably infeasible immediately following the worst kind of disaster so Data Network related
activities have been relegated to the
Required column. This implies that there be some
network services available in ACT to support rudimentary operations.
Basic Network Services include on-campus connectivity, routing and name service.
Outages can occur for a wide variety of
problems – local to campus wide and more. A longer
outage might be acceptable during a widespread outage. Downtime near a deadline may
shorten the acceptable outage length. Individual proprietors must establish appropriate standards for acceptable downtime.
During an
outage that covers all or most of the
campus it is impractical to expect or require that
electronic records will be available in all locations. Units that are expecting to have such records available should include provision for hardcopies in their disaster plans.
Anything not listed is
either not covered by BFB IS-3 or can be deferred for a much longer interval.
V.
UCSD PHYSICAL SECURITY GUIDELINES FOR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION
RESOURCES
The purpose of
physical security planning is to provide protection for UCSD facilities housing
information system resources, the system resources themselves, and the facilities used to
support their operation. Goals include:
•
Documentation of
service interruption/disaster controls.
•
Appropriate network isolation, both within segment and externally.
•
Secure housing for computers and network distribution equipment.
•
Secure storage of media and output.
The intent of this
section is to provide UCSD administration managers and network
administrators with an overview of
a practical approach for developing both physical and environmental security capability within their organizations. Use this section of
the implementation guidelines and Supplement I,Physical Security Considerations, as a tool to help define the organization's physical EIRs and procedures for keeping them physically secure.
VI.
VIEW OF PHYSICAL SECURITY
Physical Security is
defined as measures taken to protect systems, buildings, and
related supporting infrastructure against threats associated with their physical environment. Such threats, and the measures taken to mitigate
them, depend on four factors:
A.
Inventory
Refer to Section 7 of BFB IS-3,
Electronic Information Security, with regard to completing an
inventory of
equipment for all critical, Restricted, Essential, etc. systems. Organizations should make and maintain inventories of
Physical EIRs in accordance with BFB BUS-29, Management and Control of University Equipment. This physical inventory, together with the inventory of
data used by the organization, can be the
point of departure for constructing policies and procedures.
B.
Physical Issues
The basic physical characteristics of
the UCSD facility housing the information system or
systems determine the level of
such physical threats as fire, roof leaks, or unauthorized
access. In particular, whether the facility is fixed (e.g., a building), or mobile (e.g., a trailer
or boat) is significant in deriving appropriate security measures.
C.
Disaster Scenarios
The particular location of the UCSD facility housing the information system or systems
determines the characteristics of
natural threats (including earthquakes and flooding), man-made threats (such as burglary, civil disorders, or interception of
transmissions and emanations), and damaging nearby activities (including toxic chemical spills, explosions,
fires, and electromagnetic interference from
emitters such as radar).
D.
Procedural Issues
The operation of
UCSD information systems sometimes depends on supporting materials such as special forms, unique hardware (e.g. check printers), etc. The failure or substandard performance of these materials may interrupt operation of
the system and may cause non-performance of
critical systems in the event of a disaster.
VII.
UCSD LOGICAL SECURITY GUIDELINES FOR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES
“Logical” security appropriate to
an EIRs placement in the matrix is
mandated by the BFB IS-3. The purpose of
logical security planning is to ensure the reliability and integrity of the data being
secured, and to prevent its unintentional disclosure.
Logical security can be considered to consist of
5 factors:
A.
Authentication and Authorization
Controls must be in place to ensure that requested access to an
EIR is allowed (authorization), and that the entity requesting the access is what
it appears to be (authentication). It is
generally desirable to somewhat decouple these so
that
new schemes for either may be
introduced as technology and need decree.
B.
Revision control
Appropriate procedures must be documented and in place such that modification to software or data can be tracked and audited.
C.
Logging
Activity logs must be enabled and reviewed regularly for signs of
anomalous events.
D.
Backup
Data and associated software systems need to be backed up on an appropriate schedule, and
backups stored in a location which meets the security needs of the most critical or sensitive EIR expected to
be
present on any of
the
media.
E.
Privacy
Data must not be accessible, either on the server or in transit, by non-
authorized entities.
VIII.
CONCLUSION
BFB IS-3 is a long and complex guideline whose goals are to educate the University population about the need to protect data resources and to establish a framework that will ensure that the
most critical resources are protected. To that end, we have created this local guideline, which should be
of use to all departments whether they are the proprietors of any Essential Information
Resources or not.
For those holders of
EIRs these local implementation guidelines mandate
certain actions from
the campus, and by extension, campus departments.
The IS-3 Coordinator will conduct an
annual survey of
incumbents of certain titles and positions to identify EIRs. This list
will include:
•
Programmer/Analyst III, IV,
and
V (including Supervisors)
• Computer Resource Manager II and III
•
Senior and Principal Administrative Analyst
•
Management Services Officer
These individuals will review data resources held by their departments and identify EIRs based
on
the technical definitions of Essential and Restricted contained in BFB IS-3.
For EIRs in their charge, they will:
A.
Complete the Logical Security Checklist.
B.
Complete the Physical Security Checklist.
C.
Describe their backup plan.
D.
Describe their disaster recovery plan. These forms will be returned to the Coordinator for
review. The Coordinator will track compliance with these guidelines.
SUPPLEMENT I
PHYSICAL SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
Inventory
Physical inventory of equipment must be completed and maintained on
a regular basis. The example
Physical System Matrix below has
been
provided as a guide to developing a matrix of information
systems and their physical security components. A suggested course of
action:
·
Identify what equipment is required for Essential-Restricted [see Table 2, Electronic Information Resources – Proprietor Assignment] services
·
Identify servers on which Essential-Restricted data resides
·
Identify any clients that must be used to access Essential-Restricted data
·
If the Essential-Restricted function(s) are not self-contained, identify what interconnect equipment is
required
·
Inventory the parts of
this interconnect (hubs, switches, etc.) that are your organization's
responsibility.
Best practice: Install Restricted-Essential servers in monitored, secured, non-public space. This
"server room" must be climate-controlled with sufficient backup power to enable 60 minutes of
functionality/soft shutdown time if power is interrupted.
Physical Issues
Properly applied, physical security controls can prevent losses due to
interruptions in
computer services, physical damage, unauthorized disclosure of
information, loss of
control
over system integrity, and theft.
Physical access controls restrict the entry and exit of
personnel (and often equipment and media) from
an area, such as an office building, suite, data center, or room containing a local area network (LAN)
server(s).
Consider both normal access and surreptitious access when evaluating methods for restricting
physical access. Restricting normal access may include barriers that isolate each area, entry
points in the barriers, and screening measures at each of
the entry points (e.g., badges or card-
key devices). Physical modifications to barriers can reduce the vulnerability to surreptitious entry. Intrusion detectors, such as closed-circuit television cameras, motion detectors, and other
devices, can detect intruders in unoccupied spaces.
Access for the people in
the
following categories:
•
Computer Operations
•
IT Staff
•
Service and Maintenance Personnel
•
Security Guards
•
Non-affiliated Personnel (visitors, delivery agents)
must be defined to ensure that only those with proper authorization can access various restricted areas, including;
•
Server Room
•
Wiring Closets
•
Mechanical Room
•
Secured Forms-Rooms
•
Data Vault
Physical access controls must be
addressed not only the for areas containing system hardware, but also for locations containing wiring used to connect elements of
the system, supporting services (such as electric power), backup media, and any other elements
required for the system's operation.
Things to consider include:
•
Ensure secure area architecture
•
Walls all the way up to the ceiling (no access to secured area via air plenum)
•
Doors that swing shut and locked with hinges *inside* the secured space
•
Motion detectors/alarms for spaces not staffed 24x7
•
Access via card/key/cipher lock; preferably logged
•
How is access granted? How is it revoked? How often are access logs checked?
Disaster Scenarios
The particular location any of the UCSD facilities housing the critical information system or systems
determines the characteristics of
natural threats (including earthquakes and flooding), man-made threats (such as burglary, civil disorders, or interception of
transmissions and emanations), and damaging nearby activities (including toxic chemical spills, explosions, fires, and electromagnetic
interference from
emitters such as radar). Risk assessment must be considered when developing disaster control plans and should take into account the areas above.
Items to be included in developing plans for protecting utilities that support an
organization's information systems include:
•
Identifying the failure modes of
each
utility (air conditioning, electric power distribution,
heating plants, water, sewage, and other utilities) required for system operation or staff comfort.
•
Determining the need for dual-redundant or backup utilities for critical system support (such as Uninterruptible Power Supplies).
•
Ensuring that emergency lighting exists in computer rooms.
•
Ensuring that supporting utilities such as power distribution panels, communications and
telephone closets, and air conditioning systems, when located outside restricted zones
established within the facility are appropriately secured by such measures
as locks.
•
Considering the screening or filtering of external openings for air condition systems to
protect against the insertion of hazardous objects or the intrusion of pollutants.
•
Ensuring, if possible, that utility service lines (water, gas, oil, etc.) that provide support to facilities enter the building underground or are physically protected by other means, such as enclosing exposed lines in conduit, installing barriers around water and gas mains or
meters, and locking fuel tank inlet pipes.
Items to be included in developing plans for preventing the structural collapse of
an organization's facility include:
•
Determining, for a building in the construction planning stage, the likelihood of structural collapse due to natural or man-made disasters, such as an earthquake, major fire, gas explosion or sabotage, again ensuring that adequate precautions are taken regarding
structural design strengths.
•
Ensuring hardware is strapped or secured where open racks are used.
Items to be included in developing plans for preventing plumbing leaks include:
•
Locating plumbing lines that might endanger system hardware. These lines include hot
and cold water, chilled water supply and return lines, steam lines, automatic sprinkler
lines, fire hose standpipes, and drains. If a building includes a laboratory or
manufacturing spaces, there may be other lines that conduct water, corrosive or toxic
chemicals, or gases.
Items to be considered in developing plans for guarding against the interception of data include:
•
Guarding against interception of
data
transmissions. If an
intruder can gain access to data
transmission lines, it may be feasible to tap
into the lines and read the data being
transmitted. Improperly secured wireless (802.11b) networking can also be easily co-
opted; wireless access must be closely monitored.
•
Preventing electromagnetic interception. Systems routinely radiate electromagnetic energy that can be detected with special-purpose radio receivers.
Depending on the scale of the operation, not all of these may apply, though power and
environmental (temperature, humidity) control must be considered.
Procedural Issues
•
Special forms and hardware (e.g. AP and Payroll check stock, special forms printers) for
unique processing must be inventoried.
•
Backup form stock, hardware and tapes must be stored in offsite vault area.
•
Procedures for access to the stock and hardware and the circumstances under which that access may occur must be codified and documented.
Things to consider:
•
How
are backup tapes for servers housing Restricted/Essential data handled?
•
Where are the tapes stored? How are the tapes transported to the storage facility?
•
Are
there logs of what data is
on which tapes, and where the tapes currently are? Are
these logs verified? How often?
•
Input/stock forms: what type of sensitive stock (paychecks, official seal stock) is kept, and where? How is it accounted for?
•
Output: how is access to sensitive output controlled?
TABLE 3: Example: Physical Inventory
Physical System Matrix

SYSTEM
CRITICALITY
SENSITIVITY
FORMS
Hardware Inventory
Required
Client Software
Required
Procedures
Y/N
|
|
Essential
|
Required
|
Deferrable
|
Restricted
|
Unrestricted
|
|
|
IFIS
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
9672(1), E4000(2),
SunBlade(4), modems, switches, routers
|
TN3270, etc..
|
|
|
ISIS
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
9672(1), E4000(2),
SunBlade(4), modems,
switches, routers
|
|
|
|
PPS
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
9672(1), E4000(2),
SunBlade(4), modems, switches, routers
|
|
|
|
Email
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
|
NT Servers(x)
|
|
|
|
Non-ISIS
Systems
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
|
Sun Server(x)
|
|
|
|
Kerbros
Authentication
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dial-In
|
|
|
x
|
x
|
|
|
Modem(x), Switch(x),
Router(x)
|
|
|
|
Non-IFIS
Systems
|
|
|
x
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PPS
Systems
|
|
|
x
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 MHz Radio
|
x
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone
|
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Link Family
|
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
9672(1), E4000(2),
SunBlade(4), modems, switches, routers
|
|
|
|
Wireless
|
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
Models
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisional
Controls
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Department
Email
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
|
NT Servers(x)
|
|
|
|
Department
Servers
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
|
Sun Server(x)
|
|
|
|
Department
Calendars
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
Sun Server(x)
|
|
|
|
Access
Controls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Fire controls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Offsite
Procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Tape Inventory
Procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Escalation
Procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
SUPPLEMENT II
LOGICAL SECURITY
Authentication and Authorization
Access to Restricted Electronic Information Resources must be limited to authorized users.
Authentication methods must be periodically reviewed in light of
current technological advances.
For each Restricted EIR
procedures must be in place that address the following issues:
•
How
is an authentication token (account) granted? When? Who authorizes new
authentication tokens? Are “temporary” tokens permitted?
•
How
is authentication revoked? Under what circumstances may this happen?
•
How
often are authentication tokens audited?
Strong authentication methods have at
least two of the following three properties:
•
something the entity has (e.g. a hardware token which will generate a password)
•
something the entity knows (e.g. a password)
•
something the entity is (e.g. fingerprint)
Currently, the general authentication mechanism tends to be login name/password combinations, which really use only the second property. Until circumstances change, therefore, passwords must be carefully
constructed to make them difficult to
guess. Password-based authentication mechanisms must possess rules which enforce selection of strong passwords. Passwords must be kept securely; they should not be written down.
Authentication tokens for Restricted or Essential data should not be shared between entities. If it is imperative that such sharing occur, a special token must be constructed, and the use of
this token monitored.
The Principal Holder of
the EIR will specify authorization procedures.
“Superuser” accounts
often possess the ability to circumvent established authentication and authorization schemes on locally kept data. The following guidelines must be enforced:
•
access to superuser accounts must be limited to
personnel whose job duties require them.
•
provide superusers with less powerful accounts to
use
when not performing system
administration tasks.
•
superuser accounts should not be used for other than authorized purposes.
•
activities performed using a superuser account must be securely logged, and those logs reviewed periodically.
Revision Control
Development and maintenance of
administrative applications performed by University personnel
or performed by any vendor engaged by University personnel must conform to the specifications
of BFB IS-10,
Systems Development Standards.
Logging
Activity logging is an important tool for logical security. Where ever possible, logs should be
made recording:
•
system access
•
authentication (especially failed authentication attempts)
•
data access
•
software or data modification
•
elevation of privilege
Logs, once made, should be monitored for anomalies, preferably by automated means (to
protect authorized user privacy, where applicable, and also to provide timely notification of potential problems). Systems containing Restricted EIRs must log, and those logs must be closely monitored. All
logs must be retained according to defined data retention schedules; must be backed up following the most
stringent requirements governing the criticality and/or sensitivity of the
EIRs involved in the
logged activity.
As logs themselves may contain sensitive information (account names, passwords, individual usage patterns), they must be kept securely, ideally on a separate machine dedicated to logging (secured against unauthorized access) and/or on
write-once media.
Backup
The purpose of
Backup (as distinct from Archive) is to protect the system from unintentional loss or catastrophic system failure. Most EIRs will require some sort of regularly scheduled backup; Restricted and
Essential EIRs must have a clearly defined schedule and procedure.
Backups must be treated according to requirements of the
most critical/sensitive data contained therein;
if
an EIR is in the Restricted-Essential category, guidelines for scheduling of backups and storage of media must be consistent with the corresponding Disaster Recovery Plan. In any event, backups must be periodically verified by performing test restores – the time to find out that things are not working is not
when the data has gone missing.
Physical security of backup media must be consistent with requirements for the EIRs backed up.
An acceptable backup plan will address the following issues:
•
how
often are backups performed?
•
Who is responsible for ensuring that backups are done?
•
How
is the media labeled?
•
Where is
the media stored?
•
How
often is the backup process verified (by performing a test restore), and whose
responsibility is
the verification?
•
When is the media eligible for reuse?
Privacy
All access to Restricted data must be restricted to
authorized entities only. This implies that proper access controls be in place on any system on which such data resides, and any place it might pass in
transit. Restricted data
•
Must
be encrypted whenever it is transmitted (encryption accomplished either by the
medium or at the endpoints of the transmission)
•
Must
be stored in a manner consistent with its sensitivity (servers must be secured
against unauthorized use)
•
Must
not be kept in insecure circumstances (unencrypted on a desktop, for example)
In defining data privacy standards, the following questions must be addressed:
•
How
is the data access authorization defined? How is it maintained?
•
How
is access to the server containing the data appropriately controlled?
•
What logging is in place to guard against unauthorized access?
•
What applications access the data? If they are run from client machines, how is the
privacy of
the
data in transit maintained?
•
What procedures are in place to prevent unauthorized “cacheing” of
the data in non-
secure environments (office desktops, for example)
SUPPLEMENT III
UCSD GUIDELINES FOR SECONDARY HOLDERS OF DATA DERIVED FROM
RESTRICTED ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES
Holders of EIRs
derived from
primary sources are required to maintain the same level of access security as are found on the primary source. Disaster recovery requirements, however, will vary depending on the
criticality of
the EIR to end-users and on the difficulty of
reconstructing it from the
primary source.
Table 1,
Requirements for Resource Security Under IS-3, indicates the level of access security and
disaster recovery protection that are required. Note that access security has three components: Logical Security, such as access control (approval procedures, passwords, logs, etc.), Physical Security (locked rooms, protection from
physical damage), and Managerial Security
Steps to determining security requirements
.
•
Identify your data sources. What information do you have that is derived from primary
EIRs or contains information that needs to be protected?
•
Where does it fit
in the grid? Required/restricted etc?
See Table 1, Requirements for Resource Security under IS-3, and
Table 4,
Sensitivity/Criticality Checklists.
•
Implement appropriate procedures based on level of sensitivity/criticality.
Case studies: Classifying data for Risk, Sensitivity and Criticality
The following case studies concern four different Organizational Units – A, B,
C, and D. Each of
these organizations answers the checklist of
questions to determine the level of sensitivity and criticality of the
data it manages.
Step 1
Identify the resources. In this example four secondary systems either derive data from, or provide data to, primary Electronic Information Resources holders (Proprietors).
Step 2
Using the checklist below, assign sensitivity and criticality to each resource.
TABLE 4: SENSITIVITY/CRITICALITY CHECKLISTS
|
Case Study Sensitivity/Criticality Assignment
|
|
Case Study
|
Description
|
Assignment
|
|
OU-A
|
Department maintains records of salary
information supplemental
to the employee's normal appointment salary.
This information is uploaded to PPS monthly,
and the employee's paycheck amount reflects both the salary based on job title and level, and the supplemental amount. Until upload, this
additional amount only resides in the secondary resource
holder's systems.
|
Restricted/
Essential
|
|
OU-B
|
Department maintains a labor clearing account database for salary
recharge. All employees are paid from a single departmental fund.
A journal is uploaded to IFIS monthly that debits various indexes and credits the clearing
account fund. The amount debited per index reflects the time an
employee works on the project represented by that index.
|
Restricted/
Deferrable
|
|
OU-C
|
Department maintain a database of student information for residential management. Student data are downloaded from ISIS including SSN
and PID. These data are supplemented with additional student
self-reported info such as
living preferences and/or medical conditions.
|
Restricted/
Deferrable
|
|
OU-D
|
Department maintains a graduate application and recruitment database. The data are downloaded from
OGSR and supplemented/modified to include recruitment decisions and process information.
|
Restricted/
Required
|
|
Sensitivity/Criticality Checklist
|
|
Type
|
Description
|
OU-A
|
OU-B
|
OU-C
|
OU-D
|
|
S1
|
Does the
data include information
that identifies or describes an
individual?
|
YES
|
YES
|
YES
|
YES
|
|
S2
|
Would unauthorized access, modification, or loss of the data seriously affect the University?
|
YES
|
NO
|
NO
|
YES
|
|
S3
|
Would unauthorized access, modification, or loss of the data seriously affect a business partner of the University?
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
S4
|
Would unauthorized access, modification, or loss of the data seriously affect the public?
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
S5
|
Has the
Proprietor chosen
to protect the data from general access or modification?
|
YES
|
YES
|
YES
|
YES
|
|
C1
|
Does PPS directly depend
upon the
resource for ongoing successful operation?
|
YES
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
C2
|
Does the
campus data network
directly
depend upon the resource
for
ongoing
successful operation?
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
C3
|
Does the
campus telephone system directly
depend upon the
resource for ongoing
successful operation?
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
C4
|
Does the
campus public safety system
directly
depend upon the resource
for
ongoing
successful operation?
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
C5
|
Will the
campus be
unable to
perform
an important administrative
function
correctly and
on schedule if the
resource fails?
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
C6
|
Will the
campus sustain
a significant loss of funds if the
resource fails
to function
correctly and
on schedule?
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
C7
|
Will the
campus sustain a significant liability or other legal
exposure if the
resource fails to function correctly and
on schedule?
|
YES
|
NO
|
NO
|
NO
|
|
C8
|
Will the
campus be
able to continue
operation
for a designated
period
of time if the resource fails to
function correctly and
on schedule?
|
YES
|
YES
|
YES
|
YES*
|
|
C9
|
Will the
campus be
able to continue
operation
for an
extended
period
of time if the
resource fails to
function correctly and
on schedule?
|
YES
|
YES
|
YES
|
NO
|
*Depends on the time of year
Step 3 Evaluate existing security procedures compared to requirements based on sensitivity/criticality assignment
Example 1 – OU-A
Department A's local personnel database was determined to have a sensitivity level of restricted
and a criticality of
essential, requiring this EIR to both
be in a disaster recovery plan and to
require access security.
|
Disaster Recovery
Plan
|
|
|
Recommended Steps
|
Actual
|
Actions required
|
|
Process
|
Create
formal plan
|
None in writing. Informal
procedures in place.
|
Create
formal disaster recovery plan.
|
|
Update plan
|
Not done
|
Ongoing after step above
|
|
Test plan
|
Not done formally.
|
Ongoing after step above
|
|
Coordinate with campus
|
No formal coordination in
place
|
Develop plan with ACT
how to coordinate uploads
of PPS data
|
|
Include disaster
recovery in vendor
agreements
|
Not applicable
|
None
|
|
Plan
|
Provide for running on alternative sites or by alternative methods
|
Servers running the same OS and NOS are available offsite, and could be restored to
functionality from backup tape
in under a day.
|
None
|
|
Specify emergency response procedures
|
No formal procedure in place.
|
Develop formal procedure.
|
|
Include requirements
and procedures for offsite backup
|
Tapes are stored offsite weekly (at employee's residence) but
no formal procedure in place.
|
Develop formal procedure.
Consider commercial vendor for secure storage
in addition to informal procedures.
|
SUPPLEMENT IV
REFERENCES AND LINKS
RELATED UC SYSTEMWIDE AND UCSD LINKS
UC Business and Finance Bulletin Manual (BFB)
|
IS-3
|
Electronic Information Security
|
|
IS-10
|
Systems Development Standards
|
UC Electronic Communications Policy
UCSD Policy and Procedure Manual (PPM)
|
135-3
|
UCSD Network Security Policy
|
|
135-5
|
UCSD Email Procedures and Practices
|
|
135-6
|
UCSD Web Policy Procedures and Practices
|
REFERENCE SITES:
Professional Practices for Business Continuity Planners
(http://www.dri-singapore.org/pdf/professionprac2012.pdf)
MIT Business Continuity Planning site
(http://web.mit.edu/security/www/isorecov.htm#public-plan)
The Business Continuity Planning & Disaster Recovery Planning Directory
(http://www.disasterrecoveryworld.com/)
Security Self-Assessment Guide for Information Technology Systems
(http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-26/sp800-26.pdf)
Disaster Recovery Journal (http://www.drj.com/)
DRJ free links page (http://www.drj.com/freelinks/links.html)
Disaster Planning for Libraries: Lessons from
California State University, Northridge
(http://www.fdlp.gov/file-repository/1423-disaster-planning-for-libraries-lessons-from-california-state-university-northridge?path=)
Techniques
for System and Data Recovery
(http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistbul/itl02-april.txt)
A PDF file containing the original document can be found at
http://policy.ucop.edu/doc/7000543/BFB-IS-3.
Readers should become familiar with it before reviewing UCSD implementation guidelines. An
unofficial HTML version of
this
document can be found at http://isecurity.ucsf.edu/ucop_is3.html.
Section VII of
BFB IS-3 (Electronic Information Security) states: "Each campus should establish
procedures for the physical protection of its
Electronic Information Resources (EIRs)."