PPM 230-330, Specialist
Series, relates to matters subject
to Academic
Personnel Manual (APM) Section 330, Specialist Series. For reference, subsections
of PPM 230-330 include citations to associated subsections of the APM; in all
cases, the APM is operative where referenced.
PPM 230-330-4 Definition
The Specialist series is used for academic appointees who are engaged in any
specialized research, professional activity, and University and/or public
service and who do not have any formal teaching responsibilities. Specialists
are expected to use their professional expertise to make scientific and
scholarly contributions to the research enterprise of the University and to
achieve recognition in the professional and scientific community. Specialists
may participate in University and/or public service depending upon funding
source and the duties required by the job description for the position.
The Specialist may
work without direct supervision, but usually not independently. They provide a
service to a supervisor, a group, or the institution. Specialists may not serve
as Principal Investigators, but may serve as Co-Principal Investigators by
exception and with a member of the Professor or Research Scientist series.
The Specialist series, the Specialist in
the Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Specialist in the Scripps
Institution of Oceanography are the same title series, differing in their
source of funding. Specialists in the Agricultural Experiment Station must
follow the guidelines for appointments in the Agricultural Experiment Station
PPM 230-330-8 Types
APM 330-8
PPM 230-330-10 Criteria
APM 330-10
PPM 230-330-11 Qualifications
APM 330-16
PPM 230-330-16 Restrictions
APM 330-16
PPM 230-330-18 Salary
PPM 230-330-18.a
Individuals
appointed to the Specialist series are compensated on the fiscal-year salary
scales issued by the Office of the President for the Specialist series. New
appointees are normally paid at the minimum salary rate for the rank to which
they are appointed.
APM 330-18. b
APM 330-18. c
APM 330-18. d
PPM 230-330-20 Term of Employment
APM 330-20
PPM 230-330-21 Conditions of Employment
APM 330-21
PPM 230-330-24 Academic File Review and
Final Authority
No appointment,
reappointment or academic review action is final until there has been an
academic review and the individual with final authority has approved the
action.
The UC San Diego Authority and Review Chart sets forth
the individual(s) and/or committees responsible for review, as well as the
final authority for approval.
PPM 230-330-80 Recommendation and Review
APM 330-80. a
APM 330-80. b
PPM 230-330-80. c
Advancement to Above-Scale Advancement
to Above-Scale status involves an overall career review and is reserved for
only the most highly distinguished Specialists whose (1) work of sustained and
continuing excellence has attained national and international recognition and
broad acclaim reflective of its significant impact, (2) professional
achievement is outstanding, and (3) service is highly meritorious. Advancement
requires demonstration of additional merit and distinction beyond the
performance on which advancement to Step V was based.
At UC San Diego, advancement
to Specialist, Above Scale, is reserved for Specialists with records of
outstanding, distinguished performance, judged in an arena substantially
broader than the particular research groups with which they are associated.
Testimonials from outstanding extramural research groups in the same or related
fields will be necessary in order to document the level of performance required
for advancement to Specialist, Above Scale. In some instances, advancement to
the Above Scale level may be justified on the basis of the Specialist's
publications, or on their own scientific, technical, or otherwise creative
contributions (as compared to contributions to a group effort).
Except in rare and
compelling cases, advancement will not occur in less than four years at Step V;
mere length of service and continued performance at Step V is not justification
for further advancement. A further merit increase for an individual already
serving at Above-Scale salary level must be justified by new evidence of
distinguished achievement; continued performance is not an adequate
justification. Only in the most superior cases with strong and compelling
evidence will a further increase be approved at an interval shorter than four
years.
Procedural guidelines are available in the Academic Personnel Process Manual.
REVISION HISTORY
July 1, 2017 This policy was made
effective.
April 20, 2018 Minor technical edits to
update names and policy hyperlinks.
March 31, 2020 Technical edits to remove gendered language.